Flame RetardantPolycarbonate

The hard power of Flame Retardant Polycarbonate

Flame Retardant Polycarbonate Sheet is based on bisphenol A polycarbonate resin. Through the strong covalent bond structure of aromatic carbonate groups in the molecular chain, it builds an excellent mechanical performance framework—its tensile strength can reach 65MPa, and its flexural modulus exceeds 2400MPa. This molecular-level advantage is directly transformed into physical properties far superior to traditional glass: its impact strength reaches 80kJ/m², 250 times that of ordinary float glass, and its elongation at break exceeds 100%. When subjected to severe impact, it only undergoes ductile deformation rather than brittle fracture, eliminating the risk of splashing and injury from the root of the material.
In terms of flame retardant performance, the sheet adopts intramolecular flame retardant modification technology (instead of surface coating), which distributes flame retardant elements evenly in the molecular chain, meeting the UL94 V-0 flame retardant standard (no dripping in vertical burning test at 1.6mm thickness, self-extinguishing within 30 seconds). At the same time, the limiting oxygen index (LOI) is increased to 35% (26% for ordinary PC sheets), which can effectively inhibit combustion reactions even in oxygen-enriched environments. Moreover, the smoke density (ASTM E662) released during combustion is ≤50, and the release of toxic gases (such as HCl and CO) is far below the limit specified in the GB/T 20284 standard, meeting the strict safety requirements of confined spaces such as buildings and rail transit.

Flame Retardant Polycarbonate

  • Flame Retardant Polycarbonate Sheet is 250 times stronger than glass, but half weight;
  • It is virtually unbreakable, the right material of window glass;
  • It is bullet-proof glass;
  • With wide options in colors and surface types, easy to make an eye-catching appearance;
  • Co-extruded UV protective layers on one or two sides, the lifespan will be more than 10 years without yellowing;
  • Easy to fabricate, flexible, formable and machinable, cold/hot bend, thermoform to shapes;
  • Wonderful ink adhesion and print quality;
  • Withstands most extreme hot and cold climates between -40°C to 120 °C;

Specification Of Flame Retardant Polycarbonate

TypeColors Description
TransparentClear, Bronze, Brown, Gary, Red, Lighter Blue, Lighter Green
TranslucentBlack, Opal White, Blue, Green
OpaqueBlack, Opal White, Yellow, Dark Blue, Red, Dark Grey, Dark Brown
  • Machining Polycarbonate service is available;
  • Thin polycarbonate sheet is called polycarbonate films (0.125mm to 0.8mm thickness), and they are available;
Physical PropertyTesting MethodUnitValue
Specific GravityD-792g/cm31.2
Coefficient of Linear Thermal ExpansionD-696mm/m °C0.065
Thermal ConductivityC-177W/m K0.21
Tensile Strength at YieldD-638Mpa or N/mm²>60
Tensile Strength at BreakD-638MPa or N/mm²>65
Elongation at BreakD-638%>100
Tensile Modulus of ElasticityD-638MPa2400
Flexural StrengthD-790MPa100
Fire ratingUL 94/V2/V0
Fire ratingASTM E84/Class B or Class A
Light transmittanceD-1003%From 80% to 91%

The default third-party testing organization is SGS;

Flame retardant Polycarbonate Sheet Introduction

Flame Retardant Polycarbonate offers improved fire resistance and heat deflection characteristics over the standard polycarbonate sheet. It meets the flammability codes of the engineering industry, construction industry, and transportation industry, such as UL94, ASTM E84, GB/T2408-2008, UL723, etc. Some people call it Fire Resistant Polycarbonate and Fireproof Plastic.

NAILIPU is the code of  NAILIPU Flame Retardant Polycarbonate Sheet, which offers high clarity and surface quality. It is virtually unbreakable with extremely high impact resistance. In the case of fire, flame retardants can reduce the growth of fire in a very short time. As the most popular fire-resistant plastic sheet, flame retardant polycarbonate is the right material for machine guards, industrial parts, electrical components, a wide variety of vehicles, train seats that is requiring flame retardance, and the most application in that glass used.

NAILIPU is a leading supplier of flame-retardant polycarbonate in China. Sometimes, we make flame-retardant polycarbonate with custom colors, such as grey, brown, black, red, etc.

hickness (mm)Width (mm)Length (m)Packaged as PanelPackaged as Roll
0.125mm12202.44, 400okok
0.175mm12202.44, 350okok
0.25mm12202.44, 300okok
0.375mm12202.44, 200okok
0.5mm12202.44, 150okok
0.75mm12202.44, 100okok
1mm, 1.5mm1000, 1220, 2100, 26502.44, 5.8, 12, 30, 40okok
2mm1000, 1220, 2100, 26502.44, 5.8, 12, 30okok
2.5mm, 3mm1000, 1220, 2100, 26502.44, 5.8, 12, 20okok
4mm, 5mm, 6mm, 8mm, 10mm1000, 1220, 2100, 26502.44, 5.8, 12ok 
8mm, 10mm, 12mm, 15mm1000, 1220, 2100, 26502.44, 5.8, 12ok 
16mm, 18mm, 20mm1000, 1220, 21002.44, 5.8ok

Polycarbonate skylight

Skylight roof panel

Transportation system

Aircraft interior component

Reliable Quality: We use advanced production equipment and a strict quality‑control system.

Large Capacity: Eight production lines give an annual output of 50 000 tons.

Proven Experience: We have more than twenty years of manufacturing and export history.

Responsive Service: Dedicated staff reply quickly and follow each order through delivery.

Warranty: We provide a five‑ to ten‑year product warranty.

Performance: Our sheets offer high impact resistance, good bendability, high light transmission, self‑extinguishing fire performance, low weight, sound insulation, anti‑drip surfaces, UV blocking, energy savings, and recyclability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What are the typical flame retardant mechanisms of flame retardant polycarbonate (FR-PC), and how do they differ from halogenated and non-halogenated formulations?

A: FR-PC mainly relies on three mechanisms: ① Condensation charring (PC itself forms a dense carbon layer under high temperature to block heat and oxygen); ② Gas-phase flame inhibition (halogenated formulations release halogen radicals to capture free radicals in the combustion chain, while non-halogenated ones release inert gases like CO₂/H₂O to dilute combustibles); ③ Heat absorption and cooling (additives like metal hydroxides decompose endothermically). The key difference is that halogenated FR-PC has higher flame retardant efficiency but may release toxic gases (e.g., dioxins) during combustion, while non-halogenated ones are more environmentally friendly but often require higher additive loading, which may affect mechanical properties.

A: Flame retardants (especially inorganic ones like Mg(OH)₂) usually reduce PC’s mechanical properties: tensile strength may decrease by 10-25%, notched impact strength by 15-30%, and flexural modulus may increase slightly (due to rigid additives). Mitigation methods include: ① Using reactive flame retardants (e.g., phosphorus-containing monomers) that copolymerize with PC to avoid phase separation; ② Adding compatibilizers (e.g., maleic anhydride-grafted POE) to improve interfacial adhesion between flame retardants and PC matrix; ③ Controlling flame retardant particle size (nano-scale additives have less impact on mechanical properties).

A: Core standards include: ① UL94 (Vertical Burning Test, most widely used for plastics); ② IEC 60695 (equivalent to UL94, adopted in the EU); ③ ASTM D635 (Horizontal Burning Test, for materials with low flame retardancy). UL94 ratings are defined by flame duration and dripping: – V-0: After removing the ignition source, flame extinguishes within 10 seconds, no dripping that ignites cotton; – V-1: Flame extinguishes within 30 seconds, no dripping that ignites cotton; – V-2: Flame extinguishes within 30 seconds, but dripping may ignite cotton. For FR-PC used in electrical appliances, V-0 is the most common requirement.

A: Long-term high-temperature exposure (above Tg of PC, ~150°C) causes thermal oxidation of PC chains and volatilization of flame retardants, leading to 10-20% loss of flame retardancy (e.g., UL94 rating drops from V-0 to V-1) and 15-30% decrease in impact strength. UV radiation (280-400 nm) breaks PC’s aromatic rings, resulting in yellowing and reduced tensile strength. Improvements: ① Add heat stabilizers (e.g., phosphite esters) to inhibit thermal oxidation; ② Use UV absorbers (e.g., benzotriazoles) or hindered amine light stabilizers (HALS) to block UV damage; ③ Adopt surface coating (e.g., SiO₂ film) to isolate heat and UV.

A: Limitations include: ① High-temperature breakdown (PC’s volume resistivity decreases from 10¹⁶ Ω·cm to 10¹² Ω·cm at 120°C, increasing leakage current); ② Poor arc resistance (UL746A arc resistance ≤ 120s, easy to form carbonized channels under arc). Optimization methods: ① Blend with high-insulation resins (e.g., polyphenylene oxide, PPO) to increase volume resistivity to 10¹⁷ Ω·cm; ② Add arc-resistant additives (e.g., alumina trihydrate, ATH) to extend arc resistance to 180s+; ③ Modify the surface (e.g., plasma treatment) to reduce surface leakage current.

A: FR-PC has lower smoke density than FR-ABS (ASTM E662 specific optical density at 4min: FR-PC ~50 vs. FR-ABS ~120) because PC’s charring mechanism reduces volatile organics. Toxic gas emission: FR-PC (especially non-halogenated) releases less toxic gases (CO, HCl) than halogenated FR-ABS (HCl emission ~500 mg/g vs. FR-PC <50 mg/g). 降烟降毒措施:① Add smoke suppressants (e.g., molybdenum trioxide) to reduce smoke density by 30-40%; ② Use nitrogen-phosphorus synergistic flame retardants (instead of halogen) to cut toxic gas emission by 60-80%; ③ Incorporate carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to form a compact char layer, inhibiting smoke and gas release.

A: Suitable MFR (300°C/1.2kg, ASTM D1238) for injection molding is 5-20 g/10min. Flame retardant content (usually 5-15 wt%) has a dual effect: ① Inorganic flame retardants (e.g., ATH) increase melt viscosity, reducing MFR by 15-30%; ② Reactive phosphorus flame retardants may slightly plasticize PC, increasing MFR by 5-10%. Process adjustment for defects: ① Warpage: Increase mold temperature (80-120°C) to reduce internal stress; use uniform wall thickness design. ② Shrinkage: Increase holding pressure (60-80 MPa) and holding time (5-10s); lower melt temperature (280-310°C) to reduce post-shrinkage. ③ Jetting: Increase injection speed (50-80 mm/s) or use a hot runner system.

A: FR-PC is recyclable, but mechanical recycling faces challenges: ① Flame retardant degradation (e.g., halogenated flame retardants decompose at 280+°C, releasing toxic gases and reducing flame retardancy); ② Chain scission of PC (multiple reprocessing cycles reduce molecular weight, leading to 20-30% lower impact strength). Recyclability improvements: ① Use thermally stable flame retardants (e.g., cyclic phosphorus esters) that withstand 300+°C; ② Add chain extenders (e.g., diisocyanates) during recycling to repair broken PC chains, restoring MFR and mechanical properties by 80-90%; ③ Design products with single-material composition (avoid blending with incompatible resins like ABS) to simplify sorting and recycling.

A: Performance differences: ① Flame retardancy: FR-PC has higher UL94 rating (e.g., V-0 at 1.6mm) than FR-PC/ABS (usually V-0 at 3.2mm) because ABS’s butadiene segment is flammable. ② Impact strength: FR-PC/ABS has better low-temperature impact strength (-30°C impact strength ~20 kJ/m² vs. FR-PC ~12 kJ/m²) due to ABS’s rubber phase. Application scenarios: ① FR-PC: Electrical appliance housings (e.g., socket shells), LED light covers (high transparency and heat resistance). ② FR-PC/ABS: Automotive interior parts (e.g., instrument panels, door handles) – reason: it balances flame retardancy (meets FMVSS 302, horizontal burning rate ≤100 mm/min), low-temperature impact resistance (adapts to cold environments), and processability (lower melt temperature than FR-PC, reducing molding energy consumption).

A: Emerging technologies: ① Bio-based flame retardants (e.g., phytic acid from soybeans, lignin from wood): Flame retardant mechanism is charring and gas-phase inhibition. ② Nanocomposite flame retardants (e.g., layered double hydroxides (LDHs)/PC nanocomposites): Low loading (2-5 wt%) achieves UL94 V-0 by forming a “labyrinth” structure to block heat and gas. Technical maturity: Bio-based flame retardants are at the pilot stage (flame retardancy reaches V-0 but high cost, ~3x that of traditional flame retardants); LDH/PC nanocomposites are at the semi-commercial stage (used in high-end electrical appliances, but dispersion uniformity is difficult to control). Commercialization barriers: ① High production cost (bio-based flame retardants require complex extraction processes); ② Compatibility issues (nanoparticles tend to agglomerate in PC matrix, affecting mechanical properties); ③ Lack of industry standards for emerging flame retardants (e.g., long-term stability testing methods).

Your Trusted Partner for Polycarbonate Products in China

Click on the button, you will find the Trustworthy Supplier Of Polycarbonate Sheet/Acrylic Sheet/Film or Machining services.

Contact Us